# Should we appear in the budibase default list of possible datasources?

**URL:** https://community.nocodb.com/t/should-we-appear-in-the-budibase-default-list-of-possible-datasources/919
**Category:** Integrations
**Created:** [October 28, 2023, 10:55am UTC](https://community.nocodb.com/t/should-we-appear-in-the-budibase-default-list-of-possible-datasources/919 "2023-10-28T10:55:14Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![xmontero](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex011/user_avatar/community.nocodb.com/xmontero/32/381_2.png) [@xmontero](https://community.nocodb.com/u/xmontero)
#### Post date: [October 28, 2023, 10:55am UTC](https://community.nocodb.com/t/should-we-appear-in-the-budibase-default-list-of-possible-datasources/919/1 "2023-10-28T10:55:14Z")

</div>

I’m testing budibase for RAD (Rapid Application Development) and I see budibase supports Airtable.

Should’nt nocoDB also appear in there as a “default possible option”?

 ![imagen](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex011/uploads/nocodb/original/1X/318dae82584990e80438c273544f173e0fafc269.png)

Maybe talking to the budibase guys could boost the nocoDB visibility too.

Telling this just as a suggestion, not a complaint nor a bug report nor nothing negative, just positive construction.
